Author: fdk992

Over more than a one-year period, email conversations that followed the Deputy Director’s initial partially informed issue of “paper councils” ensnared several actors that proceeded with a defamation of character campaign against the District Director, including the State Director.

The defamation campaign against the District Director was proved successful at the District meeting of May 22, 2021 when the Deputy Director deviated from parliamentary procedure when given the floor to present the Deputy Director report. He proceeded to make a motion for which he had no authority. The motion was to remove the District Director from an Executive Session, an authority not given to a Deputy Director on no constitutional or parliamentary basis. The hostile takeover of the District meeting of May 22, 2021 was further enabled by the State Parliamentarian.